Commentary
‘Wall Street Journal’ bares its sole
“Earth’s crammed with heaven, And every common bush afire with God; And only he who sees takes off his shoes; The rest sit round it and pluck blackberries.”
— Elizabeth Barrett Browning
I guess I am going to have to respond. Following last Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal front page article written by Joseph Pereira, on the topic of barefoot marathoners, I received two copies of the article and four e-mails with links to the WSJ online article, from readers of this column. Then, the article was reprinted last Sunday in a local paper, followed by a new deluge of e-mails to me from readers.
Pereira’s article made an attempt at objectivity, but was definitely slanted on the side of making most barefoot runners appear to go through a lot of pain in order to run shoeless. He purposely painted the barefoot marathoner as a masochist by highlighting Tsuryoshi Yoshino, a 32-year-old graduate student at San Diego State who talks about “getting used to the pain” and puncturing a three-inch-long blister with a sewing needle. He then misrepresented Ken Bob Saxton, a barefoot marathoner who promotes this type of running with his Web site (www.runningbarefoot.org), by introducing Saxton in the article with the words, “Because it demands discipline and a high tolerance of pain.” Saxton has never referred to barefoot runners needing a high tolerance of pain; quite the opposite. He has written that running shod (with shoes) often requires the runner to have a high tolerance of pain. He believes, as I do, running barefoot may allow the runner to learn to run more gently and avoid many of the injuries shod runners get by slamming their feet on the ground. Cushioned shoes block the feedback that we need to improve the way we run and avoid pain.
The WSJ article goes on to interview a neophyte barefoot runner who is quoted as saying, “It’s like running on sandpaper,” among other things to suggest that if you run without shoes, you must be a nutcase. Pereira had interviewed several experienced and novice people in a barefoot running forum, to which I also belong, who had successfully made the changeover from shoes to barefoot. He chose instead to quote those who rushed the transition and ended up with blisters and sore feet. The article would have been more balanced had he mentioned the many runners who followed Saxton’s advice for running barefoot, and did not end up with the problems of the runners quoted in the article.
People who see me running barefoot have asked me if it hurts. I respond that it only hurts when I run with bad form. While in shoes, I have to think about keeping good form because the shoes allow me to run improperly, temporarily without pain. If I run with bad form running barefoot, it does hurt. By running barefoot, I get constant feedback on my form and can therefore make a habit of good running form. I can do so without a lot of the pain and blisters that were emphasized in the WSJ article. The difficulty is that you must be patient and ease into barefoot running. Most runners want quick results and will run barefoot too far too soon.
The WSJ article concludes with a quote from a New York attorney who tried running without shoes earlier this year on a friend’s recommendation. He said, “Humans are too far up the evolutionary chain to be trying this kind of stuff.” This statement suggests that because we have the ability to manufacture shoes, we are somehow too advanced to go without them. This is a curious conclusion with flawed logic akin to the reasoning that because we can hydrogenate oils, we ought to use it in our cooking instead of natural oils.
I suppose any publicity about going barefoot can be of use in getting people to question the status quo. But I find it unsettling that reporters so willingly grab for the shock value in a story in order to sell papers, rather than do the due diligence necessary to provide a balanced report. I guess it should not surprise me much given that the WSJ placed a shoe advertisement just under the second page of the article.
- Commentary
-
-
Oddities for sale
While searching the Internet for a gift for my eldest daughter, I happened upon a website that sold straitjackets.
-
My blending project
When I got divorced, I was certain that I would never get married again. Not only was I not interested in putting up with another man, but the divorce rate for second marriages is even higher than the rate for first marriages.
-
When stuck, act like a Chilean miner
On one side of the stair rail, two chubby legs kicked up and down as if in a swimming pool. On the other side, a tear-stained, reddened face howled for help.
-
The warnings of Sulfite
In my newsletter I try to touch on the subject of sulfite every few years because this seems to happen on a pretty regular basis. The latest visit was from the couple who were just back from Europe.
-
The numbers don’t add up
• 500 million: number of eggs recalled
• 1,300: reported cases of salmonella
• 82,000: number of hens allowed before a CAFO permit is required in Indiana
• 6: days needed for CAFO eggs to cool down
• 13: cost in pennies per industrialized CAFO egg
-
Untangling the Kudzu for a new school year
While walking the dogs on a country road the other day, I noticed a for sale sign on a lot hidden behind an overgrowth of vines and brush. The vague imprint of tire tracks nearby reminded me a house was visible on the lot a few short months ago. Gray, dilapidated and abandoned, nature totally disguised the house from sight after just one summer of neglect.
-
Germs are OK…sometimes
I saw a commercial last week for a motion activated soap dispenser. The announcer said something to the effect of did you know your soap dispenser pump is covered with germs?
-
Trying to tame the homework monster
“I can’t take it!! Four hours of homework every night — it’s just too much. What are these teachers thinking?”
-
Good year for crabgrass
Q: My lawn seems to be mostly crabgrass this year. What are reasons that my lawn has much more crabgrass than my neighbor’s lawn? A.N. Zionsville
-
The favor of a reply is requested
My best friend from high school used a rubber stamp and ink to stamp a message on the envelope of every letter he would mail (this was way before e-mail came about). The message said, “The favor of a reply is requested,” and it appeared just below a picture of an animal — I think it was a penguin.
- More Commentary Headlines
-
